Occupation: Circuit Court Judge Pro Tem for Douglas County
since 1999; Hearings Referee.
Occupational Background: Circuit Court Judge Pro Tem; Hearings Referee; Attorney;
Judicial Clerk.
Educational Background: Willamette University, Doctor of Jurisprudence, 1985;
University of California, Davis, B.A.; Judge Training through Oregon Judicial
Department.
Prior Governmental Experience: Current Circuit Judge Pro Tem and Hearings Referee
for Douglas County; Prosecution work for the cities of Myrtle Creek and Winston.
JUDICIAL EXPERIENCE: Ambrosini
has been working with the Douglas County Circuit Judges for 16 years.
The Chief Justice of the Oregon Supreme Court appointed Ambrosini as a Circuit
Judge Pro Tem in 1999 to meet Douglas County's needs for an additional judge.
Ambrosini is an experienced judicial candidate.
Ambrosini is a proven judge with extensive experience in Circuit Court matters
in Douglas County, having presided as a pro tem judge over a large assortment
of criminal and civil cases, including complex litigation, jury trials, sentencings,
and juvenile delinquency, abuse, and neglect cases. Ambrosini has handled probate
and guardianship cases, Family Abuse hearings, Elder Abuse hearings, Landlord
Tenant matters, and family law cases. Ambrosini also assisted the Circuit Court
Judges for 11 years, researching complex legal issues and preparing memorandums
of law.
FAMILY AND COMMUNITY: Ambrosini is 46 years of age and resides in Roseburg with
his wife, Anita, and their son. He is committed to serving the community and
has served as a volunteer coach and for various church activities. Ambrosini
is on the founding board of the Community Kitchen where he has served for 18
years. He also initiated the effort to establish a maternity home in Douglas
County and has served on the local FEMA board.
Ambrosini believes that elected representatives make the law and that trial
judges should interpret, enforce, and apply the law as intended.
Ambrosini believes that judges
should be firm, just in their decisions, and that judicial matters must be
handled conscientiously with fairness and impartiality.
(This information furnished by George W. Ambrosini.)
